Is Palestine doomed for eternity in Germany?

Palestine, doomed for all eternity? Remarks on the German election and Israel.

by Evelyn Hecht-Galinski, English translation by Milena Rampoldi.

If Schulz becomes Chancellor (what I do not hope), he will claim for the end of the EU accession talks with Turkey. Didn’t Schulz, who is a former President of the EU parliament, know that these so called accession talks were just a Fata Morgana, just as the so called peace talks between the “Jewish State” and the Palestinians are? So what pushed Schulz to take this hardline demeanor? Does he really aim to get votes from far right and far left this way? Of course, this overconfident, now sober alcoholic and former bookseller from Würselen, desperately tries to improve his image to get a couple of percent points more than indicated in the catastrophic poll ratings.

What made  the Social Democratic candidate intolerable and ineligible to me was his statement about young Palestinian men. Asked by Maybritt Illner (ZDF) if “Islam belongs to Germany”, Merkel defended her statement by adding the words “in accordance with the Constitution”. However she invited Muslim scholars to distance themselves more strongly from “Islamic terrorism”.

However, I would have wished to hear this claim from the German Chancellor also towards the “Jewish Zionist occupyiers’ friends” in Germany who always express their solidarity towards the “Judaistic State terror occupying regime”. At this point I would like to ask her this: How is this attack against human dignity compatible with our Basic Law and its article 1? It states:

Article 1: “Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority”.

Article 2: “The German people therefore acknowledge inviolable and inalienable human rights as the basis of every community, of peace and of justice in the world”.

I have had my doubts since a long time that German politicians acknowledge this and act accordingly, in particular after this extremely suspect TV duel that was prescribed as “obligatory program” on different TV channels. The only alternative was the switch-off button!

So my question is: How is this highest German constitutional principle compatible with the ongoing creeping attempt to undermine many fundamental rights? This applies to the questionable  expulsions, eavesdropping, new  face recognition scanners, restrictions to the right to demonstrate, reduction of freedom of assembly, barriers and blockades at state visits and summits, whose sole purposes  are self-celebration and exclusion of the people, treating it as  a leashed dog with  the slogan “You have to stay outside”.

How about the more than questionable arms supplies, including into crisis areas, and the growing cooperation with dictators and terror regimes, hence  the “Israelization” of Germany?

Now I can come to my main question: How is the basic law principle compatible with the additional passage that the “security of Israel” is part of the “German State Reason”, defended and supported by both candidates?

What I particularly criticise and what I found a brazenness  from the challenger Schulz was that he spoke about the “deep anti-Semitism” of young Palestinian men, to whom we have to tell that this protection of Israel is part of the German state reason.

I found a completely unnecessary derailment of the candidate. Instead, he should have supported the threatened, occupied, and dispossessed Palestinians, who have been mistreated by the Jewish state terrorism for decades (!) now. This obligation towards Palestine and the Palestinians must be on the agenda of a former Social Democratic EU-politician. Instead, Schulz offended a people under occupation. I am asking myself if he was “coached” by the representatives of the Central Council of German Jews and the Israeli Embassy.

And I negatively remember this former EU Parliament President Schulz when on 25 February 2014 I was invited by a friend (who at that time was still a member of the Social Democratic Party) and engaged struggler for the freedom of Palestine to come to the inauguration of the Nakba exposition at the Parliament in Strasbourg. There I heard that Schulz had refused to inaugurate this important and worth seeing exposition about the exodus and displacement of Palestinians in 1948.

This can be said about the so called “solidarity” of the Socialist and Social Democratic fraction in the EU Parliament with occupied Palestine. Once again, the old, a bit changed saying fits for Social Democrats: “Who betrayed the Palestinians: the Social Democrats”!

The Nakba exposition was made possible by the liberal Alde fraction, even if its liberal member, Graf Lambsdorff, vice-president of the European Parliament, is a “declared and unconditional” friend of Israel.

In my opinion, Schulz by denigrating a group of people has disqualified himself as Chancellor candidate!

Chancellor Merkel – I do not support for sure – would never bring off such a flop and shame. She would never have offended so much the weakest, the Palestinians, oppressed by the “Jewish State”, occupied, deprived from their rights and own state, just to get votes.

Schulz started indeed with this defamation without being asked and with no need. And this makes him unattractive for Palestinians, pro-Palestinian activists and for many Turkish voters as eligible alternative to Merkel.

(Martin Schulz was made honorary Doctor of Philosophy by The Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 2014…but Angela Merkel was awarded this title already in 2007 and was made honorary Doctor of the Tel Aviv University in 2011)

What we can expect from the Green, left-wing and liberal politicians concerning Palestine, however, is not more promising and leaves me at the ballot box with great perplexity.

What surprised me a lot was that the media accepted without any criticism that the “Central Council” of the Jews in Germany, the newspaper Jüdische Allgemeine and Jerusalem Post interfered in the German election campaign by criticizing “radical Palestinians” in the lists of the Marxist-Leninist Party (MLPD), with the philosemite Green politician Volker Beck in their wave.

Volker Beck even dared to ask why the Popular Front of Liberation of Palestine was not forbidden. The candidates are on the list of the PFLP which is on the “EU terror list” (because Israel requested it?). But fortunately and rightly it is NOT FORBIDDEN in Germany. The MLPD has a list with candidates  of the PFLP. And the MLPD has candidates of at least ten different nationalities and is the ONLY German party supporting the freedom of Palestine and standing for it in its election agenda.(1)

In the meantime, unnoticed by German politics and the German public, the Judaistic reprisals of the Netanyahu regime against Palestinians and Palestine go on. Netanyahu celebrates the 50 years of the occupation of Palestine on stolen Palestinian land in the Judaistic illegal settlement and guarantees to its illegal inhabitants that they have come to remain there forever. In addition, he promised that under his government not a single settlement will be dismantled, and that Jerusalem will forever be the undivided capital of the “Jewish State”. After his return to Jerusalem Billions of Dollars were given for new settlements in the illegally occupied Palestine! (2)

In this context, the Israeli hard-core Zionist and supporter of the occupation, Israeli Minister of Justice Ayelet Shaked, attacks the judges, saying that“Zionism will not lower its head” towards a universal system of individual rights. She proclaimed the new Law supported by her Party Likud and by Netanyahu and accepted by the Parliament, calling Israel a “Nation-State of the Jewish People”, as a „moral and political revolution“. This bill confers the “self-determination right” only to Jews. Arabic is not an official language any more, but is downgraded to a language with special status.

You can imagine what this means to more than 20% Non-Jews, mainly Palestinians with Israeli passports, to the dispossessed Bedouins, and to the few remaining Christians in the “Holy Occupiers’ Land”!

Anyone who until now didn’t want to acknowledge that the “Jewish State” is an Apartheid State, should now be taught better and finally support the boycott measures of the BDS campaign!

Precisely because of the German past, we are not allowed to ignore the injustice of the so called “only” democracy in the Middle East, the ethnocracy of the “Jewish State” committing land robbing, occupation, ethnic cleansing, and a racist judaization. I had other expectations from ALL German political parties: 50 years after the beginning of the second occupation, and 69 years after the foundation of the “Jewish State” at the expense of the displacement and occupation of a people, we have to speak out against this injustice!

I also appeal to German politicians and voters to think about how long this illegal and unbearable situation will be continued with German help.

Palestine,  doomed for all eternity?

Notes

4 Kommentare zu: “Is Palestine doomed for eternity in Germany?

  1. „So my question is: How is this highest German constitutional principle compatible with the ongoing creeping attempt to undermine many fundamental rights? This applies to the questionable expulsions, eavesdropping, new face recognition scanners, restrictions to the right to demonstrate, reduction of freedom of assembly, barriers and blockades at state visits and summits, whose sole purposes are self-celebration and exclusion of the people, treating it as a leashed dog with the slogan “You have to stay outside”.“

    The last sentence implies the most severe attempt to undermine a basic right: At the moment the basic right to travel freely is massively attacked by lobbyists worldwide.
    And this is the main reason why at the moment the attempts to get rid of dictatorships are stalled. When the right to travel freely is really implemented, no dicatorship can exist in the long range.

    The pseudo-alternative right-wingers who are heavily campaigning in Europe and USA are therefore actually the worst enemies of citizens‘ rights in the western world (since it has finally become clear that communism always means dictorship).
    Although they are claiming to be ‚conservative‘, their ideology in fact matches the one of the supporters of regimes like in the ‚GDR‘ (‚DDR‘, German Democratic Republic). They want to imprison people in their own countries. And like the ‚GDR‘ fascists they claim to ‚care for the safety of the country‘ while in fact they care for the destruction of the rights of the citizens and of the prople worldwide.

  2. Ich erlaube mir meinen Kommentar auf Deutsch, weil mein Englisch nicht ausreicht.

    Ich finde es sehr lobenswert, daß die MLPD u.a. einen Palästinenser zur Wahl stellt. Aber die MLPD verhält sich u.a. zu unkritisch gegenüber dem Stalinismus und der Entwicklung in der VR China. Natürlich werden von den Mainstream Medien massenhaft Lügen über Lenin, Stalin, Mao etc. verbreitet. Das ist aber doch kein Grund über passierte Verbrechen hinwegzusehen und daß es mit dem Sozialismus so nicht funktioniert hat. Ganz abgesehen davon, daß ich gar nichts von der Todesstrafe halte. Erst recht nicht aus politischen Gründen. Es ist doch klar: So ging es halt nicht!

    Wie ginge es? Keine Ahnung!

    Diese Ahnungs- und Auswegslosigkeit läßt auch mich „at the ballot box with great perplexity“, wobei ich die Linke wählen werde, ohne deren debile Position zu Palästina zu teilen. An der Urne wird weder der Kapitalismus abgeschafft noch (leider) die Palästina-Politik der künftigen Regierung geändert. Wählte ich den Palästinenser, änderte das sozusagen noch weniger als nix.

    Dennoch: Ihre Artikel und Ihre Aufklärung helfen sicher mehr, positiven Einfluß auf die Leute inner- und außerhalb der Linken zu nehmen.

    Zum Thema „Islam gehört zu Deutschland“. Das ist eine völlig nutzlose Aussage, in die man jeden Sch.. interpretieren kann. Tatsache ist, wir haben in Deutschland eine christlich-jüdische Wurzel, die aber heute von Aufklärung (leider nicht genug) dominiert wird. 40% der Deutschen sind konfessionslos. Die, die noch in den christlichen Kirche sind, sind sicher auch nicht alle gläubig, manche ja nur, wegen ihres Arbeitsplatzes in einer kirchlichen Einrichtung.

    In dieser Situation ist der Import des Islams dank saudischen Geldes und der türkischen Religionsbehörde nicht gerade ein zu begrüßender Fortschritt. Das sehen die die Parteien von CSU bis Grüne anders. Sie machen Gesetze, die z.B. die männliche Genitalverstümmelung (Beschneidung) zulassen, geschächtetes Fleisch erlauben etc. Denn Religion, gleich welcher Art, ist gut für die Herrschenden.

    Religion führt leider auch zu sehr zu kritisierenden Zuständen im Gazastreifen. Das gibt den Israelis aber keinerlei Berechtigung für ihre Besatzungspolitik.

    • Kommunismus bedeutet ausnahmslos Diktatur, und zwar der schweren Art. Das folgt bereits aus der Definition des Kommunismus. Kommunismus will zwei wesentliche Grundrechte beseitigen: das Recht auf private Produktion und das Recht auf freien Handel. Um solche Grundrechtseinschränkungen durchzusetzen, ‚braucht‘ es selbsverständlich eine massive, Orwell-artige Diktatur, die alle Bürger einzeln kontrolliert und unterdrückt. Und zwar dauerhaft, und nicht etwa, wie Stalin behauptete, ’nur temporär in der Übergangsphase‘.
      Auch Stalin konnte sich natürlich nicht über diese einfach Logik hinwegsetzen, und erst recht nicht ‚genuin kommunistische‘ Staaten wie etwa Albanien, das ein krasser Knaststaat wurde, als es kommunistisch war.

      Das Problem Palästinas ist weniger Israel als seine eigene Regierung, wenn man die Hamas so nennen will. Wenn es in der ganzen Region des Mittleren Ostens offenere Grenzen (etwa wie in der EU) gäbe, wären die ganzen Probleme nicht so groß. Und die schlimmsten Grenzschließer sind die Regimes der Arabischen Liga, die Israelis (auch und gerade arabische Israelis!) voll diskriminieren, sie nicht einmal einreisen lassen.
      Das ist eine grobe Grund- und Menschenrechtsverletzung, derartige Grenzschließungen werden meines Erachtens von Juristen und von Organisationen wie der UN viel zu stark toleriert. Staaten haben kein inhaltliches Recht, willkürlich Grenzen zu schließen, sondern nur allzuoft die Macht dazu.

    • „In dieser Situation ist der Import des Islams dank saudischen Geldes und der türkischen Religionsbehörde nicht gerade ein zu begrüßender Fortschritt.“

      In Gesellschaften mit echter Religionsfreiheit dürfen sich alle die Religion selbst aussuchen. Allerdings ist es wirklich so, dass die selben Politiker, die in Europa Islamophobie propagieren, die saudi-arabsche Islamdiktatur unterstützen.

      Und frappierend ist, dass diese Dinge inzwischen ganz offen passieren, die versuchen nicht einmal mehr, das zu bemänteln. Genauso gilt das für die ‚Interventionen‘ der letzten Zeit, etwa in Libyen oder Mali, bei denen auch gar nicht erst versucht wurde, ein ‚kriegsauslösendes‘ Ereignis herbeizureden oder das überhaupt zu erklären. Andererseits wird eine wirklich gefährliche Diktatur (Nordkorea) mit Samthandschuhen angefasst, auch ohne jeden Bezug auf Menschenrechte (die in Nordkorea aufs Übelste verletzt werden).
      Parallel dazu wird ein essentiell wichtiger Bündnispartner, die Türkei, einer Hetzkampagne ausgesetzt, die völlig kontraproduktiv ist (wer wirklich besseren Rechtsstaat in der Türkei will. kann auf keinen Fall propagieren, die EU-Beitrittsverhandlungen abzubrechen, weil die EU dann jeden Einfluss auf die Türkei verlieren würde).

      Im ‚Kleinen‘ hetzen nominell ‚christliche‘ Parteien wie die CSU identisch zur ‚AfD‘, indem sie z.B. Flüchtlinge, die keinen Pass haben, ihres Asylgrundrechts berauben wollen. Das ist schon bürokratische Diktatur, und meines Erachtens das genaue Gegenteil von dem, was Jesus lehrte.

      Das ist die aktuelle christlich-abendländische Politik. Es ist eher erstaunlich, dass der Islam nicht noch viel mehr Zulauf hat, so wie das Christentum derzeit ‚vertreten‘ wird.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort